From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 9 22:57:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592C6715; Thu, 9 May 2013 22:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB8B991; Thu, 9 May 2013 22:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k13so3594526wgh.7 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 15:57:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=3N3hu0GJxBRI9AZHyqrUMcOoLgRUA/soqgF1HgID+Wg=; b=HFPvfp3NBmGGd/SPWa3SFKqVjuxSrCLsFLMZnU23z8Iee4zV6nF2Tvxi7KFKd5zNOd Wj+DTGciww3g2at61F/DJx6FpSN122u2U1GO/gdSM0a8T6E40h+Vs08817AjXUCtQfVX 69jU6xbKBcx95mMlD6T38t/nvJzYoG0WwmXmtHEZPt/2oeV6EDb4g426KtNKOpBdlcYg 0zN2ktrwJZeBb2JqkRE8QekVPqIv6w8YdahJf1/+mPhQsDWmPh9wqa8EilNjsBcdZ9ls vgNFRbYlOi5tSb4jb3jc+y4CqmFX0yRVHie+NdN5WXXouRv81G+DtgalK1C0jRnYHczj qL2A== X-Received: by 10.180.88.162 with SMTP id bh2mr202610wib.3.1368140224837; Thu, 09 May 2013 15:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ithaqua.etoilebsd.net (ithaqua.etoilebsd.net. [37.59.37.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o3sm221409wia.2.2013.05.09.15.57.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 May 2013 15:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 00:57:00 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: Why doesn't USE_UNZIP use the base system unzip? Message-ID: <20130509225700.GN91136@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CaPKgh3XHpq3rEUV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 22:57:06 -0000 --CaPKgh3XHpq3rEUV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 03:48:34PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > So... trying to trim down dependencies in a ports build and I'm > confused as to why unzip in base (it's been in base for ~5 years) > isn't a sufficient replacement for archivers/unzip in ports. It > doesn't seem like we're doing anything incredibly complicated with > archivers/unzip, so I would think that it would be a drop-in > replacement. Am I incorrect? > Thanks, > -Garrett >=20 > PS Please CC me as I'm not currently subscribed to the list. Simple because libarchive doesn't support all the infozip format yet. My plan is to make USE_ZIP automatically use bsdtar (and not unzip so that FreeBSD 8.x can get it) and introduce a new USE_INFOZIP for ports that won't work with bsdtar. I have a patch for this: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/nounzip.diff But I didn't get time to totally exp-run it yet. regards, Bapt --CaPKgh3XHpq3rEUV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlGMKbwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzteACfcFho/sx5o6tSWkMCoW9rxBXM 3L4AoImc02FK0mkIfJwbGjXQHhBg/GZI =HQou -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CaPKgh3XHpq3rEUV--