Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:59:25 -0500 From: Dan <dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives? Message-ID: <20081202215925.GC19886@ourbrains.org> In-Reply-To: <20081202221411.W16797@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200812010959.15647.kirk@strauser.com> <gh1erh$n6s$1@ger.gmane.org> <4934E276.3050308@comcast.net> <9bbcef730812020120w539a8f14jc496b14c2fbd52ad@mail.gmail.com> <20081202110922.T14849@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081202170805.GA20420@ourbrains.org> <20081202190351.Q16084@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <gh40l2$kuc$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081202211113.GA19886@ourbrains.org> <20081202221411.W16797@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar(wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)@2008.12.02 22:14:55 +0100: >>> >> >> That's a stupid benchmark. DragonFly doesn't have SMP support yet. > > my "benchmark" is to start it install programs i use commonly and compare > it to other system. > > on single-core machine i tested FreeBSD is faster. Good things come to those who wait. IMO the best thing about DragonFly is what and how you can build on top of it. Compared to other BSDs it has a rewritten kernel, and this work continues. It will be much easier to build clustering on top of this kernel. HAMMER already supports replication, and from following this list I know some people want this feature like yesterday.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081202215925.GC19886>