From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Aug 10 12:23:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA08423
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 12:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA08413
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 12:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <53710(5)>; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 12:22:34 PDT
Received: by crevenia.parc.xerox.com id <177512>; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 12:22:25 -0700
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: ftp.relcom.ru vs. ftp.kiae.su?
Message-Id: <97Aug10.122225pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 12:22:23 PDT
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I just noticed that ftp.relcom.ru and ftp.kiae.su are the same machine,
because they appear to have rearranged their FTP area a little.  Does
it make sense to standardize on one or the other name for use in ports'
MASTER_SITES?

  Bill

Ports that use ftp.relcom.ru:
archivers/rar
archivers/unrar
misc/astrolog
russian/X.language
russian/pgp.language

Ports that use ftp.kiae.su:
archivers/arc
archivers/ha
archivers/zoo
net/trafshow
news/nntpbtr
russian/d1489