From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr  6 16:28:48 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A9B37B404
	for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Apr 2003 16:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from altair.mukappabeta.net (pC19F2E0C.dip.t-dialin.net
	[193.159.46.12])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763F643FCB
	for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Apr 2003 16:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mkb@mukappabeta.de)
Received: from mukappabeta.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])h36NVkA2000544;
	Mon, 7 Apr 2003 01:31:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from mkb@mukappabeta.de)
Sender: mkb@altair.mukappabeta.net
Message-ID: <3E90B8E2.42B2F6F7@mukappabeta.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 01:31:46 +0200
From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@mukappabeta.de>
Organization: GeFoekoM e.V.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robin Carey <robin_carey5@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <20030405161701.31564.qmail@web10908.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Two problems with 4.8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 23:28:48 -0000

Robin Carey wrote:

> 2) I don't know a lot about ``ISO C99'' but according to Slackware-8.1 

gcc 2.95.4 as shipped with fbsd 4.8 doesn't do c99 anyways.
that might be different with gcc 3.2.1 in 5.0 but I haven't checked.

--mkb