Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:38:15 +0200 From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@freebsd.org> To: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Cc: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>, Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category for VPN softwares? Message-ID: <CAD9iB3eRj_Sm=oxEFNkqrM-%2BQVXXNza-kLXAXTNmg%2BQLOvp=ng@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <954df870-50bb-c7c0-f559-94dd92fce3a6@freebsd.org> References: <20190402032434.i5tvmzjrti6bz44s@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190402044151.GG72200@home.opsec.eu> <20190402054219.pbibp2jxqhtwqkru@icepick.vmeta.jp> <954df870-50bb-c7c0-f559-94dd92fce3a6@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 10:58, Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> wrote: > Am 02.04.19 um 07:42 schrieb Koichiro Iwao: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 06:41:51AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> Create a real category vpn and move everything to it ? > > > > Sounds better! Gentoo has net-vpn category. Just FYI, Gentoo also have > > net-dialup category. PPP/PPPoE/L2TP softwares are put under net-dialup > > but I feel that classification is too fine. At least creating vpn or > > net-vpn souds good. > > How about a new "real" category vpn I am not sure if it should be vpn or net-vpn. I feel net-vpn is more suitable. > and preserving the current categories > of the ports as their additional categories (assuming that they are in net > vs. security for a reason). > I like the idea.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAD9iB3eRj_Sm=oxEFNkqrM-%2BQVXXNza-kLXAXTNmg%2BQLOvp=ng>