From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 22 20:09:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3A01065674 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 20:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anti_spam256@yahoo.ca) Received: from n12.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (n12.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [74.6.228.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6F2B8FC1A for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 20:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [76.13.12.67] by n12.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2010 20:09:44 -0000 Received: from [76.13.10.180] by t8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2010 20:09:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp121.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2010 20:09:44 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 19000.56591.bm@omp121.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 19667 invoked by uid 60001); 22 May 2010 20:09:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1274558983; bh=UtCm5KR7zset5x4XfCR141azTrNjYUyFteXZTJEttwU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dvSHjhEQ4/u+QNhrPYE4PumxZvKYaW9t/u3SzEcCNZfmra9PzrpdCfPxXj5QMq4RqmYSjr07sdmem4eaAeg8RHIT4l1PmNrhTIdMkqvS19FUSddRO41ZLsyaROpzN2uKWiEBTFZqY3bBdKnVx+VE/I/XeDI6ZfpKlIMgA5trA6U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dWFjTHFaZYFRDqaTSiYsI1WZBC6RKPdnUpXSjvTc59TfM4c2suJrm9TwgvpiB+QMuPML9D1qtlAAgxxNhNxIQM+vWze0aTbPDOQOfvpPC6HvMEdpgZNcMXB3doJAUsYhqaiKpcOhi+xim1wslD5q+skFOf5p8M6OtcNlqEq8MKI=; Message-ID: <859576.19201.qm@web65512.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: uUPtbQgVM1lnOGuGN4enIB.Q1G1QkWxPWhpPS15JuXTv9av V_66aVdb.Or9Ry1z8fCqAMFS5trLgKxT3uSNHpGl5BIHO8doJCO9X__KNwDI ezxLldgASnPHy4FpMr6CoX.Ik3rsG.BZai_zikX2PUBxCNnkFTpA.ZVXWgxt o9xV8GRpKod6.xF0b_V5ptXNlZASNm6ojgRQjthavlggjGldxlIcyoWDz9KP IKpcN904E29RnC2v..RarXumiV7XaKFkwdhRa7U.XmESGpRTuehOt54AWCHr VGcj3Xs5wOg0DSiZBGj.Nw_82s7iz1PkOpxrftecn58VLl3cTm87J6wc9ZXg IoLo5tNfvjPbhaJMbEPiTTTIb5Vkz Received: from [208.99.137.71] by web65512.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 13:09:43 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680 Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 13:09:43 -0700 (PDT) From: James Phillips To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20100522120020.D04821065691@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [#24512320] Re: Apache22 Upgrade Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 20:09:45 -0000 > Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 06:43:59 +0100 > From: Matthew Seaman > Subject: Re: [#24512320] Re: Apache22 Upgrade Failure > To: Odhiambo Washington > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <4BF76F1F.8040501@infracaninophile.co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8 >=20 >=20 > On 22/05/2010 24:01:52, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Is someone saying that FreeBSD lists are not hosted on > Mailman? Or is the > > list admin on holiday on the space station? Mailman > supports regexes for > > blocking, IIRC. >=20 > Check the message headers: the bogus replies to you come > direct from > mpcustomer.com and don't go anywhere FreeBSD mailman. >=20 > Blacklisting support@mpcustomer.com > would be an effective fix, if you > have that much control over your mail system. >=20 > =A0=A0=A0 Cheers, >=20 > =A0=A0=A0 Matthew While you don't say anything explicitly incorrect, I think it is trickier t= han that: the "From:" address is listed as freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; i= s is the "Reply-To:" address that is support@mpcustomer.com. I was also reluctant to report the message as spam since the bulk of it was= my own message! I don't want replies to my messages being hit by the spam = filter. IMO, the message body is being used as unique "filler text" to get = past Bayesian filters. I don't claim to know if the effect is intentional or accidental. -James Phillips =0A=0A