From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 22:25:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E171065670 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from mail.barafranca.com (mail.barafranca.com [67.213.67.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14468FC12 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.16.100.24]) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA84854 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:25:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at barafranca.com Received: from mail.barafranca.com ([172.16.100.24]) by localhost (mail.barafranca.com [172.16.100.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4CalqS7YBC8f for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (a89-152-174-115.cpe.netcabo.pt [89.152.174.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D4CE84F for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FA84BA1.5000809@barafranca.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 23:24:33 +0100 From: Hugo Silva User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: XENHVM on 9-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 22:25:27 -0000 On 05/07/12 11:50, Ivan Voras wrote: > Hi, > > Is XENHVM usable on 9-STABLE amd64? I seem to recall some problems > early in 9-current. I still see timekeeping problems with -RELEASE, altough switching to HTC *appears to* mitigate the problem somewhat. Other than that, the OS runs stable, but simple stuff like portsnap fetch update appear to use a lot more CPU than normal. Hugo