Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 23:24:33 +0100 From: Hugo Silva <hugo@barafranca.com> To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XENHVM on 9-stable Message-ID: <4FA84BA1.5000809@barafranca.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF-QHFUeKyY6rVcMPsEvdcZ1y538gR8BpyNBeOCKB0wYQApwqQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF-QHFUeKyY6rVcMPsEvdcZ1y538gR8BpyNBeOCKB0wYQApwqQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/07/12 11:50, Ivan Voras wrote: > Hi, > > Is XENHVM usable on 9-STABLE amd64? I seem to recall some problems > early in 9-current. I still see timekeeping problems with -RELEASE, altough switching to HTC *appears to* mitigate the problem somewhat. Other than that, the OS runs stable, but simple stuff like portsnap fetch update appear to use a lot more CPU than normal. Hugo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FA84BA1.5000809>