From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 15 1:13:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [207.154.226.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F3837B401 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 01:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id 9B03B2B309; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:13:32 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:13:32 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola To: opentrax@email.com Cc: peter@netplex.com.au, dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/24307: man page for inetd(8) missing /etc/protocols in FIL ES section Message-ID: <20010115031332.A61857@elvis.mu.org> References: <200101150853.f0F8r4Q01821@mobile.wemm.org> <200101150909.BAA02569@spammie.svbug.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200101150909.BAA02569@spammie.svbug.com>; from opentrax@email.com on Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:09:27AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-FEARSOME-20001103 i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:09:27AM -0800, opentrax@email.com wrote: > > There is no need. There is no point adding a '/etc/protocols' to the FILES > > list since inetd does not use the '/etc/protocols' file. At best it would > > be misinformation. > > > Wait. How is this misinformation? I must be missing something. Because /etc/protocols doesn't have to exist, could be wrong, etc and it doesn't make a difference to inetd, because it _does not use it_. -- Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc. - fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message