From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 21:10:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A6B16A420 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CCF43D5A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1SLA8FA093194 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1SLA8Qu093193; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:08 GMT Message-Id: <200602282110.k1SLA8Qu093193@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Nate Lawson Cc: Subject: Re: docs/90042: acpi.4 should mention that ACPI_DEBUG depends on DDB. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nate Lawson List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/90042; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nate Lawson To: Giorgos Keramidas , bug-followup@freebsd.org, njl@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/90042: acpi.4 should mention that ACPI_DEBUG depends on DDB. Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:08:42 -0800 Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > On wto, lut 28, 2006 at 02:18:42 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" >> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org >> From: Giorgos Keramidas >> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:18:42 +0200 >> Subject: Re: docs/90042: acpi.4 should mention that ACPI_DEBUG depends on DDB. >> >> On 2005-12-06 19:00, "Wojciech A. Koszek" wrote: >> >>> System: FreeBSD laptop.freebsd.czest.pl 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: \ >>> Tue Dec 6 19:19:23 CET 2005 root@laptop.freebsd.czest.pl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ACPITEST i386 >>> Please commit this patch or similar, since it must be documented somewhere >>> in basesystem. >>> diff -upr /usr/src/share/man/man4/acpi.4 src/share/man/man4/acpi.4 >>> --- /usr/src/share/man/man4/acpi.4 Fri Jul 15 19:35:25 2005 >>> +++ src/share/man/man4/acpi.4 Tue Dec 6 19:45:34 2005 >>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ >>> .Cd "device acpi" >>> .Pp >>> .Cd "options ACPI_DEBUG" >>> +.Cd "options DDB" >> Is "DDB" really necessary though? I thought that ACPI_DEBUG only controls >> the amount of debugging messages printed to the system console; with or >> without a kernel debugger. > > Giorgos, > > You're right. Although this report is faked, problem reported here is quite different -- > with ACPI_DEBUG but without DDB, produced acpi.ko has unresolved symbol: > AcpiDmDumpMethodInfo. Some #ifdef's are probably missing. > > cognet@ suggested to let njl@ know about it. Thus, I'm putting him in CC. > Once this bug is fixed, I'll close my PR. ACPI has a built-in debugger when ACPI_DEBUG is defined. You do need options DDB when compiling with it. I think the manpage update is fine. -- Nate