From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 26 18:29:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42881065672; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E568FC19; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Q3YEw-0001KN-It>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:29:34 +0100 Received: from e178011057.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.11.57] helo=munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Q3YEw-0002MY-FE>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:29:34 +0100 Message-ID: <4D8E308C.2060004@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:29:32 +0100 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com References: <4D8DAD7E.8090109@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4D8DC619.9080503@freebsd.org> <4D8DDFC4.9070003@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110326134804.GA78089@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4D8E2830.70105@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110326191927.1bd25c06@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20110326191927.1bd25c06@ernst.jennejohn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.11.57 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:40:31 +0000 Cc: Kostik Belousov , freebsd-x11 , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, jkim@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: XIO: fatal IO error 35 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:29:35 -0000 On 03/26/11 19:19, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:53:52 +0100 > "O. Hartmann" wrote: > >> On 03/26/11 14:48, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:44:52PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> On 26.03.2011 11:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>>> on 26/03/2011 11:10 O. Hartmann said the following: >>>>>> Updating ports and source of my FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 host, equipted >>>>>> with a >>>>>> AMD/ATi HD4830 graphics board driven by X11 xf86-video-ati driver (which >>>>>> has >>>>>> been recently update as far as I saw), >>>>>> resulted this morning in an 'un-login-able' box. >>>>>> >>>>>> I see the xdm-login requester, but after successfully login, I see for a >>>>>> second >>>>>> the desktop (windowmaker), but X11 immediately dies and resets to the xdm >>>>>> requester again. >>>>> Are you subscribed to our x11 list? It's quite low volume. >>>>> Please see recent messages in its archive, perhaps they could help you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> No, I'm actually not subscribed to that list. Since the problem occured >>>> since yesterday's update out of the blue, I thought it could be more >>>> FreeBSD related than X11 related. But I will reply to the X11 list as >>>> well. I simply forgot in my desperate pain, sorry. >>>> >>> See >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2011-March/010737.html >> >> I downgraded the AMD/ATi driver to version xf86-video-ati-6.14.0_1, I >> desperately need my boxes since I have to finish work. >> Three different types of AMD/ATi graphics cards out of the same product >> class are not working with the new xf86-video-ati-6.14.1 and as the >> above mentioned link suggests, the solution is well known. I was >> wondering how this port could be so easily slipped into the repository ... >> >> Since the patch Jun-uk Kim referred to is a GIT patch and it seems to >> work, is there a 'simple' way without installing the GIT stuff from >> ports to patch the defective port? >> > Have you looked at the link? The patch is trivial and can easily be > applied by hand. > Yes I did.