From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 25 08:36:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085FF5FA411 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FShFW6WK0z4rt2 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DDB1A5FA58E; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4FD5FA410 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FShFW5dXgz4sFc for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B095210FE6 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13P8aFdj044531 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 13P8aFHT044530 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238411] igb(4): Wake on Lan not working with Intel I210 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: abraham@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable13? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:36:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238411 --- Comment #9 from Abraham122x --- A very unprofessional approach I did yesterday, but just as curiosity. The original Intel driver I compiled yesterday are not showing the WOL flags anymore for my NICS. Therefore I commented following "if" source code line= in "if_igb.c": /* APME bit in EEPROM is mapped to WUC.APME */ eeprom_data =3D E1000_READ_REG(&adapter->hw, E1000_WUC) & E1000_WUC_APME; /* if (eeprom_data) */ adapter->wol =3D E1000_WUFC_MAG; After that, when I shut down the machine, the LED's of the NICS where still active (as it should be with WOL). When I sent a WOL magic packet to the NI= C, the corresponding LED of the NIC was flashing. So the packet was arrived and accepted, but unfortunately the machine was not powered on. Does this someone help for further analysis? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=