From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 10 13:30:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E72016A4BF for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (nwkea-mail-2.sun.com [192.18.42.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC1A43FCB for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:30:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tomppa@finland.sun.com) Received: from sunfin.Finland.Sun.COM ([129.159.101.10]) by nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8AKUMsF019021; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ultrahot.Finland.Sun.COM (ultrahot [129.159.101.87]) ESMTP id h8AKULcP010499; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:30:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from ultrahot.Finland.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8AKUKLx023006; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:30:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from tomppa@localhost)h8AKUKJ1023003; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:30:20 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <16223.35291.354753.437544@ultrahot.finland.sun.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:30:19 +0300 To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) In-Reply-To: References: <16222.8328.482125.571191@ultrahot.finland.sun.com> <16222.14948.423489.596523@ultrahot.finland.sun.com> <20030910112539.F53623@carver.gumbysoft.com> <16223.32410.556709.818592@ultrahot.finland.sun.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 9) "Informed Management" XEmacs Lucid cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ufs related panic with latest current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tomi.Vainio@Sun.COM List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:30:30 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: > Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland writes: > > First maxusers was 0 then when changed it to 8. > > That's a regression. Keep it at 0. > I understood that there is a bug on new kmem allocator and this was an attempt to reduce kmem allocations but it didn't help. Do you know if this is going to fixed somehow or should people just install more memory to get system stay up? Tomppa