From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 05:47:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 4526D16A4D0; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:47:38 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203BA16A4CE for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:47:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F1A43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:47:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8C5lbPY020044 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:47:37 GMT (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8C5lb8J020041 for perforce@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:47:37 GMT (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:47:37 GMT Message-Id: <200409120547.i8C5lb8J020041@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to julian@freebsd.org using -f From: Julian Elischer To: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: PERFORCE change 61374 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:47:38 -0000 http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=61374 Change 61374 by julian@julian_ref on 2004/09/12 05:46:49 A hackish fix for preemption and threads, Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/nsched/sys/kern/kern_switch.c#22 edit .. //depot/projects/nsched/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c#49 edit .. //depot/projects/nsched/sys/kern/sched_ule.c#31 edit .. //depot/projects/nsched/sys/sys/proc.h#30 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/nsched/sys/kern/kern_switch.c#22 (text+ko) ==== @@ -396,6 +396,10 @@ return; } + if (((flags & (SRQ_YIELDING|SRQ_OURSELF|SRQ_NOPREEMPT)) == 0) && + maybe_preempt(td)) + return; + CHECKRUNQ(kg, td) tda = kg->kg_last_assigned; if ((kg->kg_avail_opennings <= 0) && @@ -453,7 +457,7 @@ kg->kg_last_assigned = td2; } kg->kg_avail_opennings--; - sched_add(td2, flags); + sched_add(td2, flags|SRQ_NOPREEMPT); } else { CTR3(KTR_RUNQ, "setrunqueue: held: td%p kg%p pid%d", td, td->td_ksegrp, td->td_proc->p_pid); ==== //depot/projects/nsched/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c#49 (text+ko) ==== @@ -1018,7 +1018,8 @@ #endif { - if (maybe_preempt(td)) + if (((flags & SRQ_NOPREEMPT) == 0) && + maybe_preempt(td)) return; } } ==== //depot/projects/nsched/sys/kern/sched_ule.c#31 (text+ko) ==== @@ -1662,13 +1662,13 @@ /* let jeff work out how to map the flags better */ /* I'm open to suggestions */ - if (flags & SRQ_YIELDING) + if (flags & (SRQ_YIELDING|SRQ_NOPREEMPT)) { /* * Preempting during switching can be bad JUJU * especially for KSE processes */ sched_add_internal(td, 0); - else + } else sched_add_internal(td, 1); } ==== //depot/projects/nsched/sys/sys/proc.h#30 (text+ko) ==== @@ -658,6 +658,7 @@ #define SRQ_YIELDING 0x0001 /* we are yielding (from mi_switch) */ #define SRQ_OURSELF 0x0002 /* it is ourself (from mi_switch) */ #define SRQ_INTR 0x0004 /* it is probably urgent */ +#define SRQ_NOPREEMPT 0x0008 /* Just don't ok? */ /* How values for thread_single(). */ #define SINGLE_NO_EXIT 0