From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  6 21:37:19 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CFF1065676;
	Fri,  6 Jan 2012 21:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.212.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384678FC12;
	Fri,  6 Jan 2012 21:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so2475220vbb.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:37:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=h5I48bZmkhT/BL8aTjZtM+ME+4su8sNBZEiKc/J1Ze4=;
	b=TovoUsGPZ+hQI7Dl/UFHa0WNC3+04nTj36ACPAataWHfTqC4Rr49Y9z4xWFX/prgqb
	R+NMbmDg3kiRzsQYp+bisGr/mjycBwxRCN72fy0houhGrSH0EBu60ThAM2PfuLKC0YDB
	V15z3HTQpI7uZ4XFz6B3cxHbvBo0bMye20VuA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.26.66 with SMTP id j2mr3838387vdg.98.1325885838661; Fri, 06
	Jan 2012 13:37:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.36.5 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:37:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201201050848.18414.jhb@freebsd.org>
References: <CAJ-Vmo=qNu9KpF6kSofychNcjwexFKvAT8bnwd3gVr-VPymN5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<201201050848.18414.jhb@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:37:18 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: U9y4aWPHvV9i3FSLOZqseimAzS4
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonGoQVPiktO_t7yCJ2uV7nsVs4d4sETwUUWoUwW_VshfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible to make subr_acl_nfs4 and subr_acl_posix1e
	disabled?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:37:19 -0000

On 5 January 2012 05:48, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> [ A bit excessive on the cross-posting? =A0arch@ alone was probably fine =
]

I wanted to capture the attention of relevant people, as I don't want
to break some subtle setup that I'm not at all aware of.

> NFS doesn't actually use them curently, only UFS and ZFS do. =A0Unfortuna=
tely
> we've yet to make it possible to compile ZFS into the kernel, so you can'=
t
> make the sys/conf/files bits completely accurate yet (it would be nice to
> let folks who don't need FFS for a ZFS-only system remove FFS and UFS, bu=
t
> this would break that):

Ok. I'll just test that the GENERIC build works and then commit it.



adrian