From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 01:26:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE4F16A4CE for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 01:26:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73B243D6A for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 01:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBF18565F; Fri, 13 May 2005 10:56:47 +0930 (CST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 9DC704D2FF; Thu, 12 May 2005 21:26:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:26:45 -0400 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Matthias Buelow Message-ID: <20050513012645.GF1061@eucla.lemis.com> References: <8b6eae96050510071037d3b6e4@mail.gmail.com> <4280C277.4030904@jim-liesl.org> <27C1250C-9BFD-4FA8-876C-09DF5504B058@isncom.com> <4280EE3C.8050505@jim-liesl.org> <20050511095142.GA12629@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> <428243EA.9070707@jim-liesl.org> <20050512060034.GA25077@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> <4283736B.10805@incubus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4283736B.10805@incubus.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: peter.orlowski@physik.tu-berlin.de cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of gvinum RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4 ?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 01:26:53 -0000 On Thursday, 12 May 2005 at 17:16:59 +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Peter Orlowski wrote: > >>> At this point, I'm thinking that as far as S/W RAID goes in FreeBSD, the >>> "R" is pretty meaningless >> >> Well, "R" does not mean "redundant" but "realtime backup" ;-(. > > BTW., what is the status of RaidFrame on FreeBSD? I remember some time > ago people were working on integrating it into 5.x or so? I have good > experience with Raidframe on NetBSD, and less good with vinum on FreeBSD > so I'd be delighted if Raidframe could make it into FreeBSD (and work > equally well, of course). RAIDFrame was introduced to FreeBSD some years ago, but died during to lack of love. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers