From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Jan 16 13: 4: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from csunb0.leeds.ac.uk (csunb0.leeds.ac.uk [129.11.144.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE9E837B400 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:03:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from cslin.leeds.ac.uk (csunc0.leeds.ac.uk [129.11.144.3]) by csunb0.leeds.ac.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA01034; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:59:32 GMT Received: from cslin006.leeds.ac.uk (cslin006 [129.11.146.6]) by cslin.leeds.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/) with ESMTP id UAA12023; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:59:31 GMT Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:59:30 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst To: Dima Dorfman , toor@nisser.com Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/24364: I don't think so! Message-ID: <20010116205930.D5867@comp.leeds.ac.uk> References: <200101160450.f0G4o2E75582@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200101160450.f0G4o2E75582@freefall.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dima Dorfman wrote: > It does, but it isn't very clear about it: > > > # > # named. It may be possible to run named in a sandbox, man security for > # details. > # > named_enable="NO" # Run named, the DNS server (or NO). > named_program="named" # path to named, if you want a different one. > named_flags="" # Flags for named > #named_flags="-u bind -g bind" # Flags for named > > > The last line is an example of how to run it in a sandbox. Hmm, would this make it any clearer, do you think? named_enable="NO" # Run named, the DNS server (or NO). named_program="named" # path to named, if you want a different one. named_flags="" # Flags for named #named_flags="-u bind -g bind" # Flags for named, if running in a sandbox. If not, please suggest something which would. :-) -- Ben Smithurst / csxbcs@comp.leeds.ac.uk / ben@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message