From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 21 15:14:16 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0171065674;
	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115418FC14;
	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1LFEFZH046681;
	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:15 GMT (envelope-from jh@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from jh@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p1LFEF99046677;
	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:15 GMT (envelope-from jh)
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:15 GMT
Message-Id: <201102211514.p1LFEF99046677@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: yuri@tsoft.com, jh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: jh@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/35377: process gets unkillable (-9) in "ttywai" state
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:16 -0000

Synopsis: process gets unkillable (-9) in "ttywai" state

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: jh
State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 21 15:10:31 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
Feedback timeout from submitter. The bug still exists according to bde@
but old tty layer had a workaround (comcontrol(8) configurable timeout).
(Thanks to bde@ for explaining all this.)

I think it's better to close this and submit new PR(s) for the new tty
layer bugs if necessary.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=35377