From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 2 12:39:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA18474 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 2 May 1997 12:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tyger.inna.net (root@tyger.inna.net [206.151.66.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA18462; Fri, 2 May 1997 12:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dolphin.inna.net (jamie@dolphin.inna.net [206.151.66.2]) by tyger.inna.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA26442; Fri, 2 May 1997 15:39:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 15:38:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Bowden To: Terry Lambert cc: jgrosch@sirius.com, fullermd@narcissus.ml.org, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, chuckr@mat.net, FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM target In-Reply-To: <199705021815.LAA09090@phaeton.artisoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 2 May 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Temping as it might be, a Ping 'o' Death attack might bring us more truble > > then we want. > > Of course, if someone wanted to build a little program to connect to > their smtp server and send an "RSET\r\n" every > to keep the smtp server process alive and it's pages in core... > > And then if a certain mailing list of someone's friends were made aware > of the URL to pick up their copy of the program... > > And then if it's realized that Linux is a memory overcommit architecture... > > It seems to me that this hypothetical person would play hell with their > ability to start spam sending processes. > > It seems to me. What's that URL again? Jamie Bowden Network Administrator, TBI Ltd.