Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:10:27 +0100 (BST) From: markzero <markzero@logik.ath.cx> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/86654: libSDL port symlink directory request Message-ID: <20050927231027.ACBEE62AB@logik.ath.cx> Resent-Message-ID: <200509272320.j8RNKJLa026882@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 86654 >Category: ports >Synopsis: libSDL port symlink directory request >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Sep 27 23:20:19 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Mark R (m@darklogik.org) >Release: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 i386 >Organization: n/a >Environment: System: FreeBSD logik.internal.network 5.4-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 #1: Thu Jul 28 01:10:31 BST 2005 root@logik.internal.network:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LOGIK006 i386 >Description: Very little code distributed on the net actually compiles against the SDL port because for some reason the port installs into /usr/local/include/SDLNN, where NN is a version number instead of /usr/local/include/SDL. A symlink to maintain compatibility would be very nice. >How-To-Repeat: Install libSDL from ports and try to compile any SDL example code from the net. # cd /usr/ports/devel/sdl12 && make install >Fix: # ln -s /usr/local/include/SDL11 /usr/local/include/SDL The makefile could make this change automatically, perhaps asking the user if it should (when more than one version of SDL is being used on the system). >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050927231027.ACBEE62AB>