From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 27 10:09:24 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA18473 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 10:09:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA18467 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 10:09:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA31049; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 19:08:04 +0100 (CET) To: "Daniel C. Sobral" cc: Garrett Wollman , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: removing f2c from base distribution In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 28 Jan 1999 02:13:44 +0900." <36AF4948.D0F88A52@newsguy.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 19:08:03 +0100 Message-ID: <31047.917460483@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <36AF4948.D0F88A52@newsguy.com>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >Garrett Wollman wrote: >> >> < said: >> >> > A lot of people use a lot of things out of ports. Why should Fortran >> > be different? >> >> Because Berkeley Unix has /always/ included a FORTRAN compiler. > >Somehow I feared you might have said that... :-) > Yes, it was impolite to point out a mistake like that in public... Poul-Henning "Just because Berkeley always did it that way doesn't mean it is the right way" Kamp -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message