From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 11:20:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E6A16A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:20:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74ABA43D2D for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3EBKTlt055305 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:20:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3EBKTxx055304; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:20:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:20:29 GMT Message-Id: <200504141120.j3EBKTxx055304@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org From: Anthony Ginepro Subject: Re: usb/79436: Panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Anthony Ginepro List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:20:29 -0000 The following reply was made to PR usb/79436; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Anthony Ginepro To: Ian Dowse Cc: Anthony Ginepro , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: usb/79436: Panic: ohci_abort_xfer: not in process context Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:15:55 +0200 On 04/13/05 00:58, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <1113326117.980.4.camel@renaissance.homeip.net>, Anthony Ginepro wri > tes: > >Hi Ian, > > > >I tried ucom.c patch alone first however copying it from evolution broke > >it then having to go to work fast I patched both usbdi.c and ucom.c (got > >from mutt this time). > > > >Since then I don't have a panic anymore, I still have to retry palm > >synchronization. > > > >Do you need me retrying to only patch ucom.c ? > > Thanks for trying it. Yes, if possible, could you test with just > the ucom.c patch? I've committed the ucom.c patch to RELENG_5 now, > so it would be good to get confirmation that the usbdi.c patch is > necessary. I'm reluctant to commit the usbdi.c patch without a > considerable amount of testing, as it is a significant though subtle > change to the ordering of USB transfer completion, so it might break > some configurations. > > Ian OK, I've upgraded to latest 5.4-STABLE and the computer doesn't panic anymore when I plug the palm in the craddle. Thanks, Anthony.