From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 15 06:02:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDA61065683 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vehemens@verizon.net) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384E78FC19 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vehemens@verizon.net) Received: from sam ([71.107.2.67]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K5M0061UOR78C43@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:01:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:07:31 -0700 From: vehemens To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Message-id: <200808142307.32015.vehemens@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Subject: [CFT] drm updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:02:01 -0000 On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 16:48 -0400, Coleman Kane wrote: >Argh for the Linuxization of the DRM code. Well to be fair, the BSD's haven't been doing their share for a while. All this net/open work in "my own repro" hasn't helped either. The inclusion of the intel gem code was actually a good thing as the multiple branch linux work was a disorganized mess at best. It also seems to of generated more traffic on this list then I have seen in a long time (wake-up call?). On a side note, intel just eliminated any reason for a BSD user to buy any of their new hardware. yea?? Personally I really haven't cared to much about git master usability as I'm waiting for radeon dri2 and r600 support. Having said all of that, I'll add that I'm hoping to get a commit bit soon given that I have a number of local patches that reduces the unnecessary differences (that's the plan anyway).