From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 2 23:38:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCA816A41F for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:38:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F66243D45 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:38:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE26CCF6A0 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:38:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:38:12 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: ce+d+2xaM08Q0/nV6j6lsmcVyPwbnkRwYViiBJurswgf 1128296291 Received: from gumby.localdomain (dsl-80-41-73-55.access.as9105.com [80.41.73.55]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57FF57035A for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:38:11 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 00:38:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050930151310.7bc7c80f@corona.grimstveit.no> <433D3AE5.9060102@alvorlig.dk> <20051003010736.5a3640f1@corona.grimstveit.no> In-Reply-To: <20051003010736.5a3640f1@corona.grimstveit.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510030038.11589.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Problems w/portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:38:15 -0000 On Monday 03 October 2005 00:07, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote: > J. Martin Petersen wrote on Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:17: > > Was this on a ports tree initialized with 'portsnap extract'? > > Seems like I must have forgotten to do this on a few of my machines. Things > seem to work better now. Sorry for this. Are you sure about that? It seems a bit of a coincidence that I posted a very similar problem, within an hour of your post. I definately initialized with 'portsnap extract'.