Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 01:55:26 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD-Questions <FreeBSD-Questions@socruel.nu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ivan@careytech.com.au Subject: Re: Kernel Options fo a File Server Message-ID: <d7195cff0705222355u780d2873wc624731a530a6e5d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <302F75DC2739FB43B236373398A8C59929F6@saturnus.intra.socruel.nu> References: <302F75DC2739FB43B236373398A8C59929F6@saturnus.intra.socruel.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Carey >> Posted At: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:28 PM >> Posted To: FreeBSD-Questions >> Conversation: Kernel Options fo a File Server >> Subject: Kernel Options fo a File Server >> >> >> Hello, >> What would be the best Kernel options to run a file server? >> I will be using an Intel server mother board with one Xeon quad core CPU >> installed (this mother board has 2 CPU sockets) 2GB RAM and dual 500Gb >> SATA HDD's >> >> I am thinking of options that would make the kernel efficient as a pure >> file server. > On 23/05/07, FreeBSD-Questions <FreeBSD-Questions@socruel.nu> wrote: > man tuning? > > Cheers, > Lars. Indeed, not so much kernel options, but filesystem options would likely benefit you the most, especially if you can determine ahead how big your average file size will be. -- --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d7195cff0705222355u780d2873wc624731a530a6e5d>