Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:20:48 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Porter's Handbook category violations Message-ID: <20000601232048.K32212@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all,
Please, please: go read this document:
http://www.freebsd.org/porters-handbook/x2203.html
By this, the following net ports are in violation. However, I am unsure
which ones should be repo-copied to security/ and then have their "net"
portion removed, and which aren't.
SSLtelnet/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
argus/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
boclient/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
bounce/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
clog/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
dante/Makefile:CATEGORIES= security net
iplog/Makefile:CATEGORIES= security
libnids/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
ngrep/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
pipsecd/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
queso/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
relay/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
smbtcpdump/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
sniffit/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
socks5/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
tcpshow/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
telserv/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
The most egregious violation would have to be iplog, which does not even
have "net" in CATEGORIES!
Consistency, anyone?
--
Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+
G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000601232048.K32212>