Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:14:07 -0400
From:      Dan Armstrong <dan@beanfield.com>
To:        evilfry@sg.freebsd.org
Cc:        Tony Wells <tony@camel.kdsi.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Urgent help with Reverse Lookups and FTPD
Message-ID:  <3B2F885F.75CADFC5@beanfield.com>
References:  <3B2F74D7.C057B32F@beanfield.com> <3B2F820B.4147E4E8@camel.kdsi.net> <3B2F84CE.608E7F75@beanfield.com> <01062001044603.44515@evilfry.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I already had that commented out.... without that, they cannot connect at
all.  With that out, it still tries to do the reverse, and lags for a LLOONNGG
time and intermittantly, some timeout and some don't.

Dan.



James Lim wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
>         Are you using the normal ftpd? Does commenting out the following in
> your /etc/host.allow works?
>
> # Prevent those with no reverse DNS from connecting.
> #ALL : PARANOID : RFC931 20 : deny
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> On the last episode Wednesday 20 June 2001 00:58, Dan Armstrong wrote:
> > Well, we have almost 1000 stub-bridged Ethernet LANs each on it's
> > own private subnet tunneled over an ATM network back to a router.
> > The long and the short of it is that we just cannot possibly manage
> > reverse info for the entire network.
> >
> > Dan.
> >
> > Tony Wells wrote:
> > > Do you really need thousands of addresses for your customers?
> > > I'm making an assumption , but if you're assigning addresses
> > > using DHCP, can you limit the range of addresses assigned to a
> > > reasonable amount?  If you only have say, 100 modems/xdsl/isdn or
> > > whatever connections, you don't need ~64,000 IP's available.
> > >
> > > I would try looking into limiting the addresses assigned, and
> > > then using /etc/hosts or reverse dns to resolve the IP's.
> > > (Unless of course, you really need all those IP's.)
> > >
> > > Dan Armstrong wrote:
> > > > We are a small ISP, and just turned up a new webserver running
> > > > Free4.3
> > > >
> > > > Most of our customers live on private (192.168) addresses and I
> > > > am getting slaughtered with phone calls that they cannot ftp
> > > > into their sites, and it is because their ftp programs don't
> > > > necessarily wait for Free's ftpd to timeout doing the reverse
> > > > lookup, for an address that of course does not have any reverse
> > > > information for it.  If I add their IP to the /etc/hosts BOOM
> > > > they get in instantly.  These thousands of addresses are all
> > > > dynamically assigned, so the hosts file fix is not possible on
> > > > this scale.  Is there a way I can get it to stop? HELP!
> > > >
> > > > Dan.
> > > >
> > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
> - --
> Regards,
> James Lim
> http://sg.freebsd.org | http://www.bsd-geeks.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.5.8
>
> iQA/AwUBOy+GLppTakonTMbIEQLRawCghDlBMaOCON42Ph+eDyw603V9xJwAoPOa
> Zk8EEVolF8KC84QoLxU44Cw8
> =2/HN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B2F885F.75CADFC5>