Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:39:03 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: xorquewasp@googlemail.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simulating bad network conditions Message-ID: <20090218103903.5aee2d7d@tau.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20090218085715.GA9821@logik.internal.network> References: <20090218083424.GA62198@logik.internal.network> <20090218114128.B73352@mp2.macomnet.net> <20090218085715.GA9821@logik.internal.network>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:57:15 +0000 xorquewasp@googlemail.com wrote: > On 2009-02-18 11:42:00, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > > ipfw(8) prob + dummynet(8). > > > > Hi. Thanks for the quick response. > > Is there, by any chance, an equivalent for PF? I see there's 'ALTQ' > but it looks to be poorly supported (unless I misunderstand). I have > quite a complicated setup here with PF forwarding and jails and I'm > not sure how well ipfw will play along. ALTQ can drop 20% of packets using something like: block in proto icmp probability 20% It seems ALTQ can't delay packets though, so you'd need to use dummynet for that. -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090218103903.5aee2d7d>