From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 26 14:27:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B7116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126B243D49 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:27:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A00651EE; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:27:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 98676-01-4; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:27:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B5A651EB; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:27:21 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5C2EE60EE; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:27:20 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:27:20 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <20040426212720.GB33708@empiric.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eugene Grosbein , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <20040422130659.GG722@empiric.dek.spc.org> <408CA012.AF5018B@kuzbass.ru> <6.0.3.0.0.20040426104224.09809978@64.7.153.2> <20040426145637.GB398@grosbein.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040426145637.GB398@grosbein.pp.ru> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 21:27:24 -0000 On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:56:37PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > It would be nice if patches where in the ports tree until they included > in the vendor distribution. That is what ports are for, aren't they? I haven't gotten round to this, my bad, and we're currently in freeze. Regards BMS