Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:41:03 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@earthlink.net> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@freebsd.org> Cc: audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New option to sysctl(8) Message-ID: <20011030154102.B223@gohan.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <20011029223004.B50609@heechee.tobez.org>; from tobez@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 10:30:04PM %2B0100 References: <20011029223004.B50609@heechee.tobez.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 10:30:04PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: [snip] > +.It Fl e > +Separate the name and the value of the variable(s) with `='. > +This is useful for producing output which can be fed back to the > +.Nm > +utility. > +This option is ignored if either > +.Fl N > +or > +.Fl n > +is specified, or a variable is being set. Might it just be easier to allow sysctl(8) to accept, # sysctl -w some.sysctl.var: value As valid input? Any reason why it should not? -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011030154102.B223>