Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:02:13 +1100 From: Sunnz <sunnzy@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: FreeBSD Installer vs RedHat Linux Fedora Core Installer? Message-ID: <b35fa3120701040002v3279dc07gbf04deec039a7c77@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <459CAA8D.309@u.washington.edu> References: <ad32ec270701031142j7ed4a6dbr4690189d9f8ece3@mail.gmail.com> <20070103211426.GA60153@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <b35fa3120701032242q7708f3a1x9c0b5fca75488d62@mail.gmail.com> <459CAA8D.309@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2007/1/4, Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu>: > That's changing. MS is abandoning the 2000 installer and going strictly > GUI, come Vista. > - -Garrett Well, that's not too surprising - they already have that Aero thing, so they just as well do a fancy installer. But having a fancy GUI installer shouldn't be considered as "Microsofty", as they haven't done it yet... whereas Red Hat and even Apple have done it for a long time. For a simple desktop end user like me, who just devote the whole hard disk for FreeBSD, I think the installer now is adequate. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFFnKqNEnKyINQw/HARAsLPAJwOovkeM5f9V0qt0SLhEosRZwQw+QCfSvGc > ++zZXqfxjr2GNmBHMxn8r0E= > =fJD1 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- sunnz.net - sunnz.com - sunnz.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b35fa3120701040002v3279dc07gbf04deec039a7c77>