From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 16 17:17:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA11865 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 17:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA11822 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 17:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod.dataplex.net [208.2.87.4]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA11239; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 19:16:26 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: rkw@shrimp.dataplex.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 19:14:48 -0500 To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: Mail exploders... Cc: Ollivier Robert , hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 6:38 PM -0500 4/16/97, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: >unless majordomo grows some smarts for this, I don't see it happening. > >Actually, it probably would not be too hard to majordomo to simply >forward subscribe/unsubscribe messages to a peer determined by the TLD of >the sender. That should not be too hard to do it you create a dummy "majordomo" which is just a router for messages and put the real (local) majordomo at another address.