From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri May 23 20:46:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA03916
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 23 May 1997 20:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from matrix.mdn.com (matrix.mdn.com [199.89.235.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA03911
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 23 May 1997 20:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nsi.mdn.com by matrix.mdn.com (8.8.5/8.6.9)
	id WAA05080; Fri, 23 May 1997 22:45:33 -0500 (GMT-0500)
Message-Id: <199705240345.WAA05080@matrix.mdn.com>
From: "Mitchell J. Morrison" <morrism@nsi.mdn.com>
To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: 2.2.2 Release question..
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 22:45:51 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Just out of curiosity, the 2.2.2 Release seems to work OK. However many of
the changes (in paticular, /etc/sysconfig to /etc/rc.conf, /etc/netstart to
/etc/rc.network, and the updated PPP) have not been reflected in the
documentation, man pages, handbook, or info pages. Is this a result of
by-passing the beta testers?

It was a bit confusing to get up and running with the documentation
incomplete. This may be a whine but potential new users of the system will
quickly get lost. Maybe by-passing beta was not the best idea after all. 

Keep up the good work & let me know if I can help.

Mitchell J. Morrison		morrism@nsi.mdn.com