From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 10:24:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF1F16A4CE; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE17443D39; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:24:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2HIOcvg096072; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:24:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2HIOWST096071; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:24:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:24:32 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20040317182432.GA96023@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403170818.i2H8IFYU008824@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040317112344.GB86662@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040317112344.GB86662@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc34 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:24:39 -0000 On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 03:23:44AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > I'm afraid I know. Your commit apparently broke the port an all platforms > > but amd64. :-( > > > > Have you tested this following the instructions at > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html > > ? For invasive changes like this, I'd like to ask you to always test at > > least i386 when committing changes to ports that I maintain. > > I *DID* test on i386 (5.2-CURRENT, full 'make world' just before testing > the port). I just re-tested on FreeBSD/i386: kieu(r):/usr/ports/lang/gcc34> /usr/bin/time -h make package ... Creating bzip'd tar ball in '/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/gcc-3.4.0_20040310.tbz' 49m57.11s real 16m21.78s user 7m13.72s sys kieu(r):/usr/ports/lang/gcc34> ll gcc-3.4.0_20040310.tbz -rw-r--r-- 1 root ncvs 13.0M Mar 17 09:48 gcc-3.4.0_20040310.tbz What breakage did you see? I didn't test on releng4, is that where the breakage occurred?