From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 21:43:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A74E16A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:43:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B006543D2D for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:43:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from curtis@npc-usa.com) Received: (qmail 13321 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2004 21:11:17 -0000 Received: from dsl017-040-162.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO crab.npc-usa.com) ([69.17.40.162]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Sep 2004 21:11:17 -0000 Received: from [10.0.1.12] (OSX [10.0.1.12]) by crab.npc-usa.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id R5CNQ8L8; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:10:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200409211422.10752.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> References: <451E9011-0BF5-11D9-B049-000393934006@npc-usa.com> <200409211422.10752.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Curtis Vaughan Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:11:15 -0700 To: "Donald J. O'Neill" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port upgrading - my way X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:43:16 -0000 OK, I took Donald on with his test and this is what I got: Here's my INDEX-5 info before running portversion 4947853 Mar 15 2004 INDEX-5 and here it is after 5804696 Sep 21 13:54 INDEX-5 So, a definite change. And when I ran portversion -vL= the first time, I got the info provided immediately below. But the second time I ran portversion -vL= there was not output. So, what exactly does that mean? and does that mean that now I should run portupgrade -a now? apache-1.3.31_6 > succeeds port (port has 1.3.29_3) bandwidthd-1.2.1 > succeeds port (port has 1.2.0_1) bash-2.05b.007_2 > succeeds port (port has 2.05b.007) bsdiff-4.2 > succeeds port (port has 4.1) expat-1.95.8 > succeeds port (port has 1.95.7) ezm3-1.2 > succeeds port (port has 1.1_1) freebsd-update-1.6 > succeeds port (port has 1.5) freetype2-2.1.7_3 > succeeds port (port has 2.1.5_2) gd-2.0.25,1 > succeeds port (port has 2.0.15_1,1) jpeg-6b_3 > succeeds port (port has 6b_1) libiconv-1.9.2_1 > succeeds port (port has 1.9.1_3) libtool-1.5.8 > succeeds port (port has 1.5.2_1) m4-1.4.1 > succeeds port (port has 1.4_1) openldap-client-2.2.15 > succeeds port (port has 2.2.6) p5-Net-SSLeay-1.25 > succeeds port (port has 1.23) pam_ldap-1.7.1_1 > succeeds port (port has 1.6.7_1) perl-5.8.5 > succeeds port (port has 5.8.2_5) png-1.2.6 > succeeds port (port has 1.2.5_3) popt-1.7 > succeeds port (port has 1.6.4_2) portupgrade-20040701_3 > succeeds port (port has 20040208) postfix-2.1.4,1 > succeeds port (port has 2.0.18,1) rsync-2.6.2_3 > succeeds port (port has 2.6.0) ruby-1.8.2.p2_1 > succeeds port (port has 1.8.1_2) samba-2.2.11_1 > succeeds port (port has 2.2.8a_1) sudo-1.6.8.1 > succeeds port (port has 1.6.7.5) unzip-5.51 > succeeds port (port has 5.50_2) webmin-1.150_5 > succeeds port (port has 1.130_10) On 21 Sep, 2004, at 12:22, Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > On Tuesday 21 September 2004 12:40 pm, Curtis Vaughan wrote: > I just want to know whether there is any reason I >> shouldn't be doing it this way. In other words, by doing it this >> way is there a potential problem or error that my result? >> > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Yes, there is. As far as I can tell from what you've given, you're > depending on INDEX-5 to be up to date after your ports upgrade. I > don't believe it is and you need to run make index or some other > means of getting INDEX-5 to be up to date.. > > Try this experiment: > cvsup your ports > note the date and size of /usr/ports/INDEX-5 > run " portversion -vL=" or portversion -rRvc > keep track of that output > now cd /usr/ports > make index > note the date and size of INDEX-4 > run portversion -vL= or portverstion -rRvc > > I think you'll see a lot more of your installed stuff needs > updating. > > Don > -- > Donald J. O'Neill > donaldj1066@fastmail.fm > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"