From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 21:19:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B34106564A for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B1D8FC13 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8BLAmBE011222; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:10:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p8BLAmMP011219; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:10:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:10:48 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Daniel Feenberg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20076.56940.849206.283586@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:10:48 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:19:52 -0000 On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > If you are asking, "Is there a FreeBSD command to cause the KVM switch to > move to the next system?" then the answer is "I don't know and it would amaze > me if there were." There's often a key sequence to advance to the next port or a specific port. > If the question is "Does the switch care what the OS is?" then the answer is, > you can press the physical button on the switch to change the system > connected. The OS doesn't know it doesn't have the screen and keyboard, and > is in no way affected by the KVM switch, just as the KVM doesn't know or care > what the OS is. Well... there's monitor detection by the video card. That can cause problems. Also, going through the KVM can reduce video quality with VGA and high resolutions.