From owner-freebsd-security Wed Jul 12 22:41:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B3A37B7EA; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:41:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA74304; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:41:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:41:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Jason Godsey Cc: FreeBSD Security Advisories , security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-00:23.ip-options [REVISED] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Jason Godsey wrote: > This doesn't look to fit the subject: FreeBSD Ports Yes, it was a typo..I forgot to remove 'Ports' from the mail header from the previous advisory I sent out. > I have a filter that looks for FreeBSD and pages me, it however skips port > advisories since I don't use any ports. Thanks! You must have set that up quickly, since I only started doing that a few days ago :-) I'll try and be more vigilant in future, but I can't guarantee I won't slip up again. I suggest you don't autofilter them, but do it manually - it will only take a second to verify from the contents that it's a ports advisory. If you really must do this, I suggest you filter on "Catgeory: ports" in the body, not the message header which is tacked on at the last step when I send the advisory out. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message