From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Nov  9 22:38:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA07465
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 22:38:10 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA07458
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 22:38:07 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA00667;
	Sun, 9 Nov 1997 22:37:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199711100637.WAA00667@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Ruslan Shevchenko <Ruslan@Shevchenko.kiev.ua>
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Could FreeBSD be a viable platform for large SQL/SAP/etc 
 enterprise applications?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Nov 1997 09:24:48 GMT."
             <3466D2DF.D1703721@Shevchenko.kiev.ua> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 22:37:52 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Amancio Hasty wrote:
> 
> > ? ?   for clients -- if you love Unix -- then Linux.
> > ?
> > ? I'd say you must be joking, but based on the accuracy of the rest of
> > ? your response, this is perfectly in character.
> > ?
> >
> > His posting was just flame bait .
> >
> 
>   No, it is not flame.    It is real problem.
> 
> 

Care to elaborate?

	Amancio