From nobody Thu Sep 16 22:40:41 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F5417BEC07 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 22:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan-lists@shatow.net) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [52.11.127.251]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H9X9b0lvbz4bB6; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 22:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan-lists@shatow.net) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CD2DDB5; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:40:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id 5eHyo7OxIMUS; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Clarification on MOVED entries when flavouring a port DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.xzibition.com C41DFDDAC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=shatow.net; s=mxc204805312015; t=1631832041; bh=nBZdIUU5Ut0A3ofPmNAkweeX2UNTtT1pDFS9/aXWY5M=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Us74QctN91Hrp6yOBmCJoNeoKLk1ukcnAfZblFePLPC9mENfIvL5/55PvVlf7Kfyy 9GaFQLTLk/BTUljJedPUE2E13jarTa2/JoFAye1PkvY0Fpy1Diho+PJjtgxPm3mwmT P3DPSCc5g0/7/Z1aNTpzDq6GfN0a7FNK2WPXl/JiORnSrXNEXzR+u7ChPzjvHjbIAR yjzeB3+RtFlTO309XjKKF9JBFeFwTXP309Gi7DablzuE+NdNDUY0SIvp8d5XP7JvN3 mfTyaWg0Z8ApNY6Efx5uxV2LGBjZzeoEJwbujpWqdT3b7hDck7RWKg7pgk/Mkfs53a ybS5tm8Ie7P/g== To: Mel Pilgrim , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <48ff904a-aad1-6440-f319-ce3e38fcc250@bluerosetech.com> From: Bryan Drewery Message-ID: <9d3aa65f-c84b-c0d0-c475-07d4d5473c17@shatow.net> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:40:41 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <48ff904a-aad1-6440-f319-ce3e38fcc250@bluerosetech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H9X9b0lvbz4bB6 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=shatow.net header.s=mxc204805312015 header.b=Us74QctN; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=shatow.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bryan-lists@shatow.net designates 52.11.127.251 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bryan-lists@shatow.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[shatow.net:s=mxc204805312015]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[shatow.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[shatow.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:52.10.0.0/15, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 9/14/2021 4:48 PM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > I'm flavouring a port.  The pkg name will change when upgrading from > unflavoured to flavoured because the flavoured version will have a > PKGNAMESUFFIX.  Does this require a MOVED entry? > > The PKGNAMESUFFIX is based on default-versions so the "default" flavour > is whatever the current default version is.  If I need a MOVED entry, do > I make the entry with the current default version? > If the old default behavior now is renamed to FOO-flavor and is also the new default, then a MOVED entry is probably not needed. That is, if the user can ignore the change then MOVED does not need to be considered. MOVED is primarily for paths rather than FLAVORs but it _can_ be used for FLAVOR renames. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery