From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 05:31:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98316106566B; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BF78FC12; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so3274612ewy.3 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:31:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CKR8mRPkNDu5EP0c1QxYgzQW7CF7uCS3AOWsBXJYluc=; b=nAKkj/amUf29qwva0Qr+EmKPB4OkUgMXOW/NVQwx1RB/TXU0F2pr5IJ0RE2JozVciM 4uf3Opn0NeGr+EE3zs7LTdqsX07d39foL938qP5+cfDWZJ8v8EXW7ebjVlQxeEHqqPEv LBzhsjFvQmpsn2QxmmrTQUtZI7i/z0bq8KTrA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gTbkilCg4RVHkIAp5gCz48hRV+6FwiyK7q5TTuLdyNSTmChBULrnTIBliylXLhjtEe rEa/25CS7wlbOt9yGv9mHhZhzkIJtvpkTqqje9ibO3uFW7jbt0XDz1vZvIQVQfsVDWji x8CET9my7G5kfzZUMLCT7ZfR9XqzP5qM7lmmA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.201 with SMTP id a51mr1773500wef.154.1260768697858; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:31:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:31:37 -0500 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: dougb@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AHCI/ATA_CAM for dummies? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:31:39 -0000 On 12/14/09, b. f. wrote: ... >>So far so good. :) I am actually kind of curious as to why "device >>ata" is needed, but it doesn't seem to be hurting anything. > > It is needed if you have AHCI hardware, and are operating in AHCI > mode, but don't have ahci(4) in your kernel; or if you don't have AHCI > hardware, or have AHCI hardware operating in legacy mode, and still > want to use ATA devices. > I forgot to mention that ata(4) is also superfluous if you have hardware that can use the siis(4) driver, and that driver is in your kernel.