From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 2 09:27:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F400106566C for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@samodelkin.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEFE8FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so4164268ggn.13 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:27:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.41.100 with SMTP id e4mr2190671obl.63.1322818054610; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:27:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.76.225 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 01:27:34 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.92.220.178] Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:27:34 +0700 Message-ID: From: Max Khon To: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: CVS removal from the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:27:36 -0000 Hello! I know that it is too early to speak about this, but I would like the dust in the mailing lists to settle down before real actions can be taken. As soon as ports/ (and doc/) are moved to SVN I do not see any compelling reasons for keeping CVS in the base system. Those who still use it for development can install ports/devel/opencvs (like all the src/ developers do for ports/devel/subversion/). In my opinion it is just another piece of bitrot that resides in the base system for no real reasons. Max