From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 17:59:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9A816A41F for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:59:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dreamer2@tikhvin.info) Received: from rly3.z8.ru (counter.z8.ru [217.106.232.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253AC43D46 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:59:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dreamer2@tikhvin.info) Received: from elm.z8.ru (elm.z8.ru [217.106.232.16]) by rly3.z8.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j97HxLBt074155 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:59:22 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dreamer2@tikhvin.info) Received: from [192.168.8.20] (41.dsl.telesto.lsi.ru [212.58.217.41] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by elm.z8.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j97HxLZk006933 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:59:21 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dreamer2@tikhvin.info) Message-ID: <4346B77A.1090805@tikhvin.info> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:59:22 +0400 From: Vitaly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <43465B61.6050801@tikhvin.info> <20051007163632.GA1680@teardrop.org> In-Reply-To: <20051007163632.GA1680@teardrop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.85.1/1121/Fri Oct 7 21:38:02 2005 on counter.z8.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: BETA5 panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:59:29 -0000 James Snow wrote: >On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:26:25PM +0400, Vitaly wrote: > > >>Panics occured only with ath clients activity. I have attach >>backtraces, what should i do else? >> >> > >I'm following up with my own post from a few days ago, only because it >looks like the same issue. (To my untrained eyes anyway.) > > > No, i don't have ULE, but problem here in my kernel SCHED_4BSD