From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 15:20:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841EF16A41F for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:20:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2084043D46 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:20:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0KFK3XA016071 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0KFK3hR016070; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:20:03 GMT Message-Id: <200601201520.k0KFK3hR016070@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Ceri Davies Cc: Subject: Re: kern/91720: pxeboot always tries to do an rpc call to an nfs-server X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ceri Davies List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:20:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/91720; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ceri Davies To: Ruben Kerkhof Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/91720: pxeboot always tries to do an rpc call to an nfs-server Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:13:26 +0000 On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:12:30PM +0100, Ruben Kerkhof wrote: > On 1/20/06, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Ruben Kerkhof wrote: > > > I tested the NFS path as well, nothing broke :-) > > > > Ah, good man! Will pass it on to my mentor for review then. > > > > Thanks very much for your help! > > > > Ceri > > > > One thing I just thought about is that I tested NFS with > -DLOADER_NFS_SUPPORT. I haven't tested it with -DTFTP_SUPPORT, so I > don't know how diskless clients behave in that case. OK, no problem. I suspect that they break, or at least boot.nfsroot.nfshandle won't get set and there is code in the client specifically for the diskless case that expects to find something in there. I'll try to set up a test environment and see. Thanks for the warning. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere