From owner-freebsd-alpha  Fri Apr 14  3:55:48 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Received: from grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp [133.9.152.154])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8288737B630
	for <freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 03:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fujimori@grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp)
Received: from grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (fujimori@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id TAA32745
	for <freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:55:33 +0900
Message-Id: <200004141055.TAA32745@grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp>
To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Subject: DU4.0E and Tru64/5.0
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:55:33 +0000
From: Yoriaki FUJIMORI <fujimori@grafin.fujimori.cache.waseda.ac.jp>
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Dear listers,
I have got some funny experience in compiling gcc-2.95.2 on DU4.0e
and Tru64/5.0.  So, I would like to get some comments here.

I am compiling big packages on DU4.0e and Tru64/5.0.  For doing
so I often need gcc.  But, I found that gcc-2.95.2 is not eacy
to compile from scratch on DU4.0e and Tru64/5.0.
It seems to me that DU's /usr/ccs/lib/cmplrs/cc/ld in the latest
dupatch-kit may be broken; binaries are not linked properly.
# Stock ld that comes with DU4.0e itself works.
Meanwhile, it seems more troublesome to compile gcc-2.95.2 on Tru64/5.0.
I wonder if some of you can compile gcc-2.95.2 from scratch---just
./configure and make LANGUAGES="c ... " bootstrap-lean.

Thanks for your attention.
Yoriaki Fujimori


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message