Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 20:54:10 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.FreeBSD.org> Cc: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why can't I just `release=stable' for sup?? Message-ID: <10580.815028850@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 29 Oct 1995 21:58:04 PST." <199510300558.VAA03543@aslan.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This should work fine. I fixed it quite a while ago. The plan was > to phase out the old "stable-blah" targets once people switched to > using the release field correctly, but I guess even you haven't > done so. I've TRIED to do that! You get: SUP Upgrade of bin at Sun Oct 29 20:53:06 1995 SUP Fileserver 9.13 (4.3 BSD) 1864 on freefall.FreeBSD.org at 20:53:06 SUP Fileserver supports compression. SUP: Invalid release stable for collection bin SUP: Upgrade of bin aborted at Oct 29 20:53:06 1995 It's never worked for me, not before or after your announcement! :-) > That makes no sense. There is only one CVS tree. But you could have `bin' and `release=CVS' to get the "CVS version" of that distribution rather than making "CVS-bin" another target, yes? Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10580.815028850>