From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  9 22:37:01 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: perl@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8B5106566B;
	Wed,  9 May 2012 22:37:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu)
Received: from hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (hal.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU
	[169.229.70.150])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0598FC0C;
	Wed,  9 May 2012 22:37:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1070)
	id 34DB4119D6D; Wed,  9 May 2012 15:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:37:01 -0700
From: milki <milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu>
To: AN <andy@neu.net>
Message-ID: <20120509223701.GB15329@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205091639550.45002@mail.neu.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205091639550.45002@mail.neu.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: perl@FreeBSD.org, skv@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: p5-XML-SAX upgrade fails
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
	<freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 22:37:01 -0000

On 16:53 Wed 09 May     , AN wrote:
> Trying to update ports (portupgrade -a) results in the following failure 
> on:
> 
> FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #15 r234992: Fri May  4 
> 01:09:16 EDT 2012     root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL  amd64
> 
> I answered Yes to the question below, I did not know what it meant, so I 
> took the default.  Was that correct?

Glancing through the code, answering Yes appears to be correct for an
upgrade.

-milki