Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 22:39:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com> To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: Any objection to adding a .undef(VARNAME) to make? Message-ID: <199504220339.WAA06361@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <199504212349.RAA14054@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Apr 21, 95 05:49:40 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> FOO= 1 > FOO= undefined How about just: FOO= make an empty definition undefined. Undefineds are treated as empty in make anyway. It would also match the way .SUFFIXES: works.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504220339.WAA06361>