Date: 23 Jul 2003 12:17:41 -0500 From: Jeremy Gaddis <jeremy@gaddis.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9 Message-ID: <1058980661.3981.0.camel@jupiter.main.gaddis.org> In-Reply-To: <87d6g1zwt7.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> References: <8AE4DA75-BCC1-11D7-9DA1-000A957FF666@pacbell.net> <87d6g1zwt7.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 23:33, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> At 2003-07-23T03:55:47Z, Tony Sterrett <tonyste@pacbell.net> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same
> > machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable="YES"
> > and it will use the config file in /etc/named. To start the slave I will
> > In rc.local and it would use the config files in /etc/named/slave. Does
> > this seems ok? Is there a better way.
>
> This seems to come up every now and then. Before we start, is there any
> reason you want to have two seperate named process running, instead of
> having one process serving as master to some domains and slave to others?
No, it's generally considered {easier,better,more manageable,...} to
only have one instance of BIND. BIND can be master for some domains
and slave for others, so there really is no need.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <jeremy@gaddis.org> <http://www.gaddis.org>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1058980661.3981.0.camel>