From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 22 9:53:53 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from green.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF408155E2; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 09:53:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by green.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA14052; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:53:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: green.dyndns.org: green owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:53:29 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Cc: sumikawa@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssh Makefile ports/security/openssh/patches patch-ad In-Reply-To: <200001212255.HAA61168@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp wrote: > I am not clear whar is right way. But this is generic issue for all > maintainers. I will follow our decision. If the desicsion is that only > single mail address must be written in Makefile, please add me on > openssh-maintainers@ for easily sharing user reports. I'll call jmb today, and see if he can set it up, and e-mail you about it, okay? In any case, thanks for being another maintainer for the OpenSSH port. > And I believe that you approve of my changing and committing the > openssh port freely in spite of the representation in Makefile. Is my > recognition right? Of course, that is correct :) > --- > Munechika SUMIKAWA @ KAME Project / FreeBSD.org -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message