From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 14:39:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454EB16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:39:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A6DC43DFE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:14:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 27480 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2003 22:14:55 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by laptop.tenebras.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2003 22:14:55 -0000 Message-ID: <3FD8EC5D.3060506@tenebras.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:14:53 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-tw, zh-cn, fr, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Hussain Ali Subject: Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:39:26 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: >>>more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many >> >>Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels... >> >>Can't we steal the Linux code? ;-) > > is the netgraph version particularly slow? Not slower than a single ether channel, no ;-) Considerably slower than link layer bonding. The netgraph version provides a really useful functionality, and I suppose that 2GB and 10GB fiber interfaces will do away with any pressure to give us bonding in the kernel. Sorry, didn't mean to sound ungrateful.